Contemporary public debate is cluttered with examples of populist, emotional or illogical arguments informing policy and action, often at the expense of sound scientific evidence.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
Academics spend years proving, improving or disproving approaches, systematically developing and defending evidence to support their innovation, only to have their work brushed aside in favour of more politically palatable solutions, often unsupported by research.
But where is the community in this? Why aren’t people demanding evidence-informed policy?
The discussion regarding phonics in early school literacy instruction is an example whereby empirical evidence is contested due to emotional and populist sentiment. Phonics is a teaching method proven to be more effective for all children, and phonics-based testing will identify children who require additional instruction sooner.
Evidence from the UK demonstrated that a phonics check improved reading in the early years, so why are we rallying against a five-minute screen that could protect children from educational failure?
Ignorance of knowledge is damaging to our health and prosperity so it is surprising that the broader community is not more vocal in demanding decisions be based on scientific evidence.
Some propose that ‘truth’ isn’t as simple as it once was due to the constant evolution of knowledge. Today’s best practice is tomorrow’s outdated misconception. But surely a post-truth society is not what we want, so what can be done? For starters, politicians need to act beyond the election cycle and trust that voters can see the big picture.
The extremities of Australian politics, although vocal, do not represent the sentiment of the silent majority.
Media organisations need to support new knowledge and act in the interests of integrity.
In addition, academics must develop the skills to communicate their research to the wider community in a manner that promotes understanding.
Yet, the most powerful resource we have in the fight against post-truths is each other. Community demand for evidence-informed policies will be far more persuasive than a small bunch of academics.
Communities need to be skilled in knowing how to access new knowledge, discern credible sources and appreciate their role in determining the application of the new truths.
In the current climate of fake news and alternate facts, it’s time to demand the truth.