News 
 Opinion 
 Letters to the Editor 
 General 
 Why the secrecy on the cost of Hargreaves Mall? 

Why the secrecy on the cost of Hargreaves Mall?

01 Sep, 2010 10:24 PM
WITH reference to Robert Smallpage’s letter “Secret final bill for mall just another mistake” in the Bendigo Advertiser on August 31.

Some action must be taken to seek explanations from the City of Greater Bendigo and its council as to the justification in deciding to keep the final cost of the mall upgrade secret.

It appears to me the obvious reason is to simply keep an unpalatable truth from the ratepayers and residents.

But why?

Surely we have been prepared for a reasonably soft landing, or could there still be more bad news in relation to budget blow-outs?

It may be there are justified reasons that are beyond my thought process.

If so, please explain.

There are a total of nine duly elected councillors – not employees of the City – who are supposed to represent the residents of their wards.

Why is there virtual silence from them?

I suspect there are large numbers of ratepayers and/or residents who would like to know from their councillors whether he or she is going to permit the City of Greater Bendigo to not disclose the facts in relation to the cost of the Hargreaves Mall.

If not, what do the councillors intend to do?

If so, why have the councillors allowed themselves to remain silent?

Could I suggest the Bendigo Advertiser offer the mayor, Cr Rod Campbell, and each of the other eight councillors, along with the CEO Mr Niemann, to explain the rationale on this issue.

COLIN CARRINGTON,

Heathcote

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I would if the council in their wisdom had done the same as any other consumer does when they build or have works done they enter into a fixed price contract, with certain clauses then none of this would be a problem.
Posted by Robert Smallpage, 2/09/2010 9:59:59 AM, on Bendigo Advertiser
In the letters and blogs published on this issue, two things become clear; 1. there no longer seems to be any sanctioning power that stops both public servants and / or elected officials from doing what they like with public money and 2. the laws and requirements set out in the state of Victoria for the conduct of local government are scarcely worth the paper they are printed on. Earlier in the week Ted Coleman referred to the +25 group and pointed out that it existed as a section 86 committee and that in four years of its existence had not supplied any of the reports nor complied with the requirements of the state legislation in hand. The reality of this means that in its operation, local government is not accountable. I have long maintained that state governments are an anachronism three decades past their use by date. In effect local governments contempt of state legislation and the states refusal or inability to deal with it confirms what I have believed.
Posted by Tom Stewart, 2/09/2010 10:40:29 AM, on Bendigo Advertiser

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Bendigo Advertiser







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...