People from all walks of life and shades of politics were involved, something council never wanted to believe.

Disappointingly, despite stressed economic times, seven councillors voted against the transparent review and long overdue efficiency “health check”.

Rather, they accepted a flawed senior officers’ report that offered no positive alternatives and rejected the chance to save $1m to $5m, year after year for a one-off cost of up to $250,000.

It seems senior officers could not assess objectively a review that may lessen their control, the way they operate and their management structure.

We expected them to say “no”, but not our councillors. Councillors Cox and Ruffell recognised the review’s merit, and had courage to speak up for the community; it was ‘a bridge too far’ this time.

It’s obvious most councillors failed to consult the community, or carefully weigh up both the review proposal and submissions that countered the officers’ position. It is now clear officers have a greater influence than the public.

Ironically, some councillors who opposed the review in debate suggested a review might be a good idea after the council elections.

Council maintains an external independent and public review is unnecessary because it already does a good job. Really? The test will be whether councillors vote for the planned six per cent rate rise in June.

We must accept council’s decision at this time. However, we will encourage candidates for council elections in October to support a review.

The public is tired of council and politicians’ spin, and with few exceptions, the media’s willingness to repeat that spin. A new public website is on its way to encourage informed debate on a range of issues facing Greater Bendigo. We will notify you of the launch soon.

Ted Coleman,

Strathfieldsaye