News 
 Opinion 
 Editorial 
 General 
 Never rains but it pours for Holding 

Never rains but it pours for Holding

25 Sep, 2008 05:00 AM
WATER Minister Tim Holding must be praying for rain or a Cabinet reshuffle about now.

So far this month he’s had eggs hurled at him, been called a Nazi, and been given the silent treatment over one water project or another across the state.

Closer to home, he’s been under the pump from Plug the Pipe protesters for months over the Government’s controversial $750 million north-south pipeline project, designed to deliver 75 billion litres of drinking water to Melbourne through a pipe linking the Goulburn River to the Sugarloaf Reservoir.

Yesterday things turned ugly for the Minister when a farmer, protesting against the pipeline, was arrested and dragged off her land as she tried to block water officials from gaining access to her family farm in Yea.

What a PR disaster.

Then things went from bad to worse, when the former Australian of the Year and leading environmentalist, Tim Flannery, claimed there was no evidence to support taking water from the already stressed Murray-Darling system to pump to Melbourne. Professor Flannery believes more attention should be given to replacing coal-fired power with cleaner energy, which he said would ultimately yield more water.

To cap the day off, it was revealed the chairman of Goulburn Valley Water was being investigated over irregular travel expense claims.

This forced Mr Holding’s department to issue a statement that the reappointment of Don Cummins, chairman of the authority and a board member of the Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority, will be delayed until the investigation concludes.

Maybe today will be a better one. Maybe it will rain - or even pour.

WHAT do you think? Write a letter to the editor, or e-mail editor@bendigoadvertiser.com.au

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It seems that the Sugarloaf pipeline may offer $1 million per drip. Not good for Victoria.
Posted by gloworm, 25/09/2008 3:52:45 PM
Brumby does a backflip on his promise never to take water from north of the divide, Garrett does a policy back flip on the north/south pipeline, but neither of these monumental turnarounds gets much scorn from the Melbourne press. On the other hand, the Libs make an ADJUSTMENT to their policy on the pipe and the press have you believing that they have commited themselves to everlasting opposition.
Posted by pete mac, 25/09/2008 4:32:24 PM
Nth Sth pipline is not such a bad idea, providing and only providing you fill Eildon first, then you can be sure you have water to disperse for everyone, including the Murray. It really is simple. A little way away is a place that pours into the ocean more than 10 times what Melbourne uses per annum. Bring it over and you will keep everyone happy. Even Tassie.
Posted by nick, 25/09/2008 6:48:36 PM
Local communities all over the state are disgusted about developments - infrastructure, etc. that they don't want in their area. Consultation to this government means that after the decisions have been made, tell the local community and ignore their feedback. The current Victorian Government will find out the hard way what happens to governments who ride roughshod over local communities.
Posted by grassroots, 25/09/2008 7:35:34 PM
It is very interesting at the different treatment meted out by police against a lady farmer trying to protect her property from invasion to the non-action by police against G20 demonstrators trashing a police van.The police force has become politicised. Might does not make it right. Labor hates country people.
Posted by the sting, 25/09/2008 10:03:19 PM
A recent letter from Mr Holding in reply to emails sent to Victorian MPs in July was full of the usual rhetoric and spin with regard to the North-South Sugarloaf Pipeline. In fact just more of the political bulls--- mentioned by environmentalist Tim Flannery. With scientists, environmentalists and other experts telling this government that the pipeline is flawed, it makes you wonder why they persist. The water just doesn’t exist for their ill-fated, ill-planned, ill-costed, environmentally disastrous, expensive white elephant of a pipeline.
Posted by collywoggles, 29/09/2008 7:44:11 PM
Why do they persist with these illogical plans - a pipeline to pump water from an empty river, and a desalination plant powered by coal? I suspect the reason is that Mr Brumby has found a great way to get votes (from suburbanites who like to wash their cars and generally waste water) - while also increasing Government revenue (without the unpopularity of an obvious tax). Yes Melbourne Water gets us to pay for all of this (via Waterways/drainage charges and other fees that may soon be levied on all Victorians) - and the Brumby Government then hits Melbourne Water for "Environmental" and other charges. All the while Brumby can claim he is helping the environment! May also line a few mates up to build the desal plant? - and possibly sell off a few of our water assets in the process. Yes - it is a "win win" _ Brumby wins both times!
Posted by Alison, 1/10/2008 8:19:24 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Clark Rubber



Bendigo Advertiser







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...