News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 DODGY DOC IS FINED $56,000 

DODGY DOC IS FINED $56,000

4/10/2008 9:47:00 AM
A LOCAL doctor who defrauded Medicare has been convicted on 59 counts of obtaining property by deception and fined more than $56,000.

Dr Prem Sanjiv Bajpe, 42, was sentenced in Bendigo County Court yesterday following a three-month trial.

The court was told the offences occurred between May 2002 and October 2003 during Bajpe’s time as a general practitioner in Golden Square.

“The counts involve 82 patients, and under the 59 counts of which you were convicted there were approximately 150 individual instances of obtaining by deception alleged,’’ Judge Cohen said.

The offences occurred at Bajpe’s clinic, Holistic Family Medical Practice.

The Health Insurance Commission (now Medicare Australia), issued him with a provider number in 2002.

This gave patients access to rebates for medical services provided by him that were covered by items under the Medicare benefits schedule.

“All of the offences here involved instances where you used this system of bulk billing for services,’’ Judge Cohen said.

“The jurors were satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that you had not in fact performed the specified services claimed, and were dishonest in claiming those amounts in that you knew that you were not entitled to claim these when you did.’’

The court heard in some instances there was no record of a consultation between Bajpe and a client on the date which for which he claimed a fee.

At other times he claimed two consultation fees for the same date, but there is only record of one consultation in the patient file.

“A large number of the charges were in relation to your claiming for items 720 and 724 - provision of multi-disciplinary care plans and reviews of multi-disciplinary care plans,’’ Judge Cohen said.

“In none of the instances under the charges was there evidence that you provided anything near what the schedule required.

“In my view, your arguments and evidence about these items were far-fetched, and my impression was that they were subsequently invented to try to justify your claims.’’

Bajpe pleaded not guilty to all counts.

“Your pleas of not guilty and your manner and arguments through the course of a very extended trial, indicated that you accepted no responsibility for these events, and reflected no contrition or remorse for your offending.

“On the contrary, you raised arguments and made assertions to the effect of blaming many other people for various aspects of these events, including your patients, your receptionists, the Medicare advisory line, the HIC investigators and staff . . . and, for more recent events, the prosecution and the court, all indicating that you accepted no responsibility yourself.’’ Judge Cohen said she believed Bajpe’s conduct during the HIC investigation and trial had been ruled by his personality and pride.

She said he had at times 'systematically' stolen public money.” Offending of this type undermines the system.

“It not only diminishes public funds and ultimately costs taxpayers more, but it also undermines the confidence of both government and the public in that system.’’

In sentencing, Judge Cohen took into account the shortage of general practitioners in the area.

She acknowledged the references given by some of Bajpe’s patients.

“Most spoke of the time you spend with them.

“Many are genuinely anxious that they be able to continue to be treated by you.’’

The court heard that the jury was satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the offences were not unintentional administrative errors.

“I have decided that in all the circumstances your sentence should not be one of immediate imprisonment.

“In my view the interests of the community are not best served by that course and the imposition of very substantial fines should be seen as serious punishment and deterrence for a crime that involved obtaining money to which you were not entitled.’’ Bajpe was issued a separate fine for each of the 59 offences, totalling $56,250.

He was convicted on each count.

Judge Cohen’s decision will not directly affect Bajpe’s registration.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Deport him!! If they commit crime on our soil then send them home, if we did it over there we would be shot against the nearest wall!
Posted by MySay on 4/10/2008 7:03:39 AM
I agree with the above. Yes we need doctors but we need honest doctors trained properly and who actually care about the health and well being of patients, not just how much money the can extract! Overseas doctors come to Australia because the standards of living are much higher and the quality of life is far greater, then they abuse what we offer with no regard of welfare for the patients.

I have had the displesure of working for an OS trained professional in Bendigo who felt it was his right to treat staff and patients in an apalling nature, but he is regarded very highly within the community because he is a rotarian and has the title of Dr.

Go to any hospital in Bendigo and ask female staff members (nurses & admin) how these professionals treat them as well as patients and get honest feedback from the people who actually care about the job they do not just the money!

What a joke!

Posted by oldschool kid on 4/10/2008 11:02:37 AM
Why should a bloke in such a trusted position be allowed to continue to practice medicine after stealing money?

On top of that, he clearly tried to avoid taking responsibility for his crime - and this unnecessary trial has no doubt cost a vast sum, and wasted everyone's time. Deregister him, I say!

Posted by Golden Path on 4/10/2008 11:16:25 AM
The doctor did the wrong thing but I am glad that a wise judge looked at the whole situation and handed down a just and prudent decision. Bigoted comments such as "deport him!" show a narrow short-term attitude that, while attempting to sound tough, only sound pathetic and lonely.
Posted by Mike on 4/10/2008 11:55:11 AM
Dear MySay - how dare you!! Please indicate to me exactly where in this article it states that this individual is not Australian. Or perhaps you think he should be deported to say... Tasmania? The government still does that sort of thing, right?
Posted by ToddH on 4/10/2008 12:25:51 PM
None of us are without faults, Dr Prem is a dedicated Medical Practioner who has served the Bendigo community well, he made an error of judgement, let the first who is without fault be the one to cast a stone. We all deserve the right of forgiveness.
Posted by MVE on 4/10/2008 2:26:00 PM
I definitely agree with ToddH. MySay shame on you, you sound like an ignorant racist and make the rest of us look terrible, as well. It is just lucky we have the likes of judge Cohen making these rulings, in which she was able to apply the law and serve justice without ignoring the community's needs. Go crack a beer and put on your moccasins MySay.
Posted by RW on 6/10/2008 3:23:19 PM
But it's not like doctors don't get enough money already! Very greedy man.
Posted by Nancy on 6/10/2008 3:37:04 PM
I believe the Judgement by Judge Cohen was entirely appropriate and wise. The problem with Medicare fraud is that it diminishes the faith people have in their G.P.

It is appropriate to forgive Prem if he shows remorse, but this degree of wrongdoing would make him liable to Medical Board disciplinary action. The tag of "Dodgy" carries with it a loss of respect by society in Prem's word. In answer to ToddH, Prem was given a Provider number in Australia 12 years after usual graduation age, Prem has an Indian visage and an Indian name. Although some people in Bendigo commit fraud and corruption on a million dollar scale, I for one do not condone fraud by fleecing churchgoers or the general public through Medicare. I hope Dr Bajpe does not fall afoul of Medicare again although with his lack of contrition he can look forward to further scrutiny by Medicare.

Posted by Iconoclast on 6/10/2008 6:39:23 PM
The real Gorilla sitting on the Steinway is how widely abused the planning item numbers are, especially when they are used retrospectively. An audit of these numbers showed that NONE of these plans are ever done to the complete satisfaction, and that nursing staff are being used to create these plans. In this way the Dr is getting paid nearly $200 for a signature. The other characteristic of these plans is that the recipient is statistically more likely to be institutionalised - hardly a great outcome!

People are urged by psychologists and counsellors for their G.P. to fraudulently lie on psychiatric case management plans. The actual referral process is reversed. It then puts the G.P. in the situation of offending the patient by telling them that such referral is fraudulent but by giving in it is the G.P. that faces the music.

Perhaps Prem was showing healthy skepticism for "Dole for Doctors" that is G.P. in 2008 is offered in lieu of indexed item numbers. An example is the Accreditation Better practice payments that gives a substantial carrot to practices that sycophantically agree to the standards of the Government that continually drift towards Facism. Very few people realise that the Dr patient records in these practices and item number usage allow the Govt access to their private information to check "compliance". Why is privacy so cheap these days?

Posted by Solution on 7/10/2008 8:13:51 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
GUILTY: Prem Sanjiv Bajpe has been convicted of defrauding Medicare.
GUILTY: Prem Sanjiv Bajpe has been convicted of defrauding Medicare.

3/01/2009 | EARLIER this past week, jet setting celebrity Paris Hilton and her entourage dropped into Melbourne and among other things, splurged about $5000 in just under one hour at a trendy Chapel Street boutique.
Best Employment
 
Bendigo Access Employment
 
Ron Poyser
 
Innes Motors
 
MyCareer
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...