News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Bendigo pools leak money across city: council 

Bendigo pools leak money across city: council

11 Feb, 2012 03:00 AM
AN impending $50 million pool bill in the next decade has prompted calls for an aquatics rethink in Greater Bendigo.

Councillors this week endorsed an aquatic strategy that included a 50-metre indoor aquatic centre at Kangaroo Flat.

The council will also close the Golden Square, Long Gully and Kangaroo Flat pools and construct a Long Gully aquatic play space after the aquatic centre is built.

Figures from the 2008-09 financial year show the cost per visit to the council at the Kangaroo Flat pool was almost $30.

The Long Gully cost about $17.50 and the Golden Square pool $10.

The Elmore pool offered the best value, $0.53, while the Bendigo Aquatic Centre cost about $2.50.

Councillor James Reade told this week’s meeting Bendigo had the most swimming pools per person in the nation.

“There are 13 swimming pools within our municipality and literally they leak money... the Kangaroo Flat pool, just operating expense alone, is $28 per swim,” Cr Reade said.

“It would be cheaper for me to stand at half our swimming pools in Bendigo, shut the gates and hand out between $10 and $20 for people not to come and swim.

“We have a serious problem around the future liability of our pools, they are ageing infrastructure but we don’t have capital and resources to fully finance a project of a high standard.”

The proposed Kangaroo Flat aquatic centre would cost $28.97 million, which was about $3 million more than the 25-metre option.

The complex will include a raft of services, pools and entertainment.

Bendigo West MP Maree Edwards, whose electorate includes Kangaroo Flat, said the state government would have to fund the project.

She said the state should “dip into (its) billion dollar regional growth slush fund” to take the funding burden off Greater Bendigo ratepayers.

“It is a lot of money, $29 million,” Ms Edwards said. “The ratepayers in Bendigo don’t want to be slugged with huge rates increases because the state didn’t contribute its fair share.”

Nationals MP Damian Drum said he looked forward to working with the council to deliver the project.

He praised the council’s decision to push for a 50-metre pool instead of a 25-metre option.

“A lot still has to be done in areas such as innovation design and sustainability, but I now feel that work has truly begun,” Mr Drum said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
By the way Cr Reade we have a drainage bill of over $40m waiting to be fix too, this is constantly growing.

You have a problem sorting out what really needs to be done and what is warm and fuzzy to you.

Posted by Rampage, 11/02/2012 5:35:31 AM, on Bendigo Advertiser
Yes shut some in certain areas. But how about making the ones that stay have better facilities such as shade, seating, tables, grassed or pavement (not dirt). more adventure equipment (slides and fun stuff). If the council made the pools more appealing people will go and spend the day there and spend money there. At the moment you go for a swim get out and go home so you don't sit in the sun with your towel in the dirt. We may have more pools per head but they are crappy go have a look at other cities and see what they have. Example South Lakes in Perth Undercover open all year and heated.
Posted by Paul, 11/02/2012 5:56:44 AM, on Bendigo Advertiser
Did James apply a double standard at the council meeting when he highlighted operating expenses of $28 per swim for the Flat?

Using his reasoning and Council's 2010-11 Annual Report and Budget data, and playing on James council speech, there is an Art Gallery and a Capital Theatre and literally they leak money..., just operating expense alone per attendee is Gallery $43 and the Capital $47.

Like the local pools, both the Capital and Gallery are important to Bendigo's lifestyle. Would James dare stand in front of either, and hand out $45 for people not to attend?


Posted by Ted Coleman, 11/02/2012 8:04:29 AM, on Bendigo Advertiser
James Reade's figures are a bit wet. Greater Bendigo doesn't even have the most pools per person in central Victoria, let alone the nation. Mt Alexander Shire has a population of fewer than 20,000, yet it has five pools. That's more than double the number per person that Greater Bendigo has.
Posted by Dugald, 11/02/2012 9:31:31 AM, on Bendigo Advertiser
And how many bums on seats will it take to make the proposed gaol theatre economically viable?

Stan's little white post office gallery is another case. How much does that cost to run per its three annual visitors? Any chance it will ever come close to justifying the funds expended constructing and running it?

Has anyone in council ever done a cost-benefit analysis on any of its harebrained schemes? The Mall, Walk Bendigo, Exhibition Centre etc?


Posted by Under the Microscope, 11/02/2012 11:04:23 AM, on Bendigo Advertiser
oh here we go again just stop talking about it and fix the damn issue all this talk and the job is not getting done JUST DO IT ALREADY
Posted by __mattie__, 11/02/2012 11:13:30 AM, on Bendigo Advertiser
Would the reason some pools being more expensive than others be the lack of maintenance over the years? A lot of pools are past their useby date. Pools for all-year use are better than those that only open on a few hots days a year or a silly beach.
Posted by Trout, 12/02/2012 9:54:14 AM, on Bendigo Advertiser

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Bendigo Advertiser







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...