News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Bendigo Art Gallery says no to Abednego painting 

Bendigo Art Gallery says no to Abednego painting

07 Nov, 2009 04:00 AM
Bendigo Art Gallery has rejected a painting of the bare-knuckled boxer the city was named after because of conditions placed on its display by a mystery owner.

The owner is at odds with the Bendigo Art Gallery, claiming it baulked at displaying the portrait of William Abednego Thompson because of the cost.

He also urged the City of Greater Bendigo to step in to ensure the public were able to view the painting.

But the Bendigo Art Gallery has hit back, saying they are council’s advisers on all matters relating to the visual arts and therefore have the final say.

A spokesman for the owner said they were surprised the gallery had rejected the loan offer for the oil painting.

“No reason or reasons were provided as to why they reached such a decision and the owners’ representative was never contacted during the gallery’s deliberations,” he said.

“The owners will now reconsider their options but are more than happy that the painting has been secured, is in Bendigo, but it may not again be made available to the Bendigo Art Gallery given their recalcitrant attitude.

“Perhaps our council needs to intervene to ensure this significant work which relates to Bendigo’s earliest history and naming, is made available within the gallery for the general public to see and enjoy. It seems the gallery’s director and board disagree.”

The spokesman said it was not uncommon for conditions to be placed on artworks as part of a loan offer.

“Understandably the owners placed several conditions that accompanied the loan offer, which included the gallery being responsible for framing the painting and attending to its conservation, actions which any art gallery would attend to in relation to works to be exhibited.

“The offer also included a request for a nominal annual fee to be paid during the loan term, which may have been the main reason why the offer was rejected.

“However one of the conditions made it clear that if any of the other conditions were unacceptable, the owners were prepared to negotiate.

“Another condition indicated the owners would ultimately offer the painting to the Bendigo Art Gallery for purchase by them, and the nominal loan fees would be deducted from the agreed price at that future time.”

Bendigo Art Gallery president John Higgs said the terms and conditions of the offer were unreasonable.

He said an agreement had been reached with council 10 years ago regarding the gallery.

“In the agreement the gallery board is the advisory committee to the council on all matters relating to the visual arts,” Mr Higgs said.

Frank Cusack’s Bendigo a History details the origins of the city’s name.

“There seems no reason to doubt . . . that the creek derived its name from an employee of the Mount Alexander North run, an ex-sailor . . . who being handy with his fists, was nicknamed, `Bendigo’,” Cusack writes.

The Bendigo Art Gallery is unlikely to again host the Archibald Prize next year. The gallery has hosted the prestigious portrait exhibition for the past two years.

Bendigo Art Gallery president John Higgs said it appeared likely the award would not leave the Art Gallery of New South Wales in future.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The Bendigo Art Gallery Board have every right to reject such an extortionate approach - what a rogue or Indian Giver! Let's trust someone offers this gold-miner an acceptable price for the artwork and it is then unconditionally loaned to the Bendigo Art Gallery for the proper enjoyment of all Bendigonians.
Posted by Bendigonian, 7/11/2009 10:54:21 PM, on Bendigo Advertiser
The residents of Bendigo own the Gallery and the collection. So who said no to the Abednego painting? The Art Gallery director, John Higgs, the Board at a minuted meeting, or the council? Higgs states the agreement the gallery board has with council is that Gallery Board is an advisory committee to the council on all matters relating to the visual arts. That is all the Board is, an advisory committee. Council has the final say. So, when did "the Board, advise and request the council, via a council officer report at a formal council meeting, that council should refuse this historical painting?
Posted by Rlane, 8/11/2009 12:20:15 PM, on Bendigo Advertiser
Mystery buyer, Bendigo Art Gallery, Council; sort it out. Make this piece of artwork available to the people it should really belong to - the people of Bendigo.
Posted by Bear M, 9/11/2009 11:43:56 PM, on Bendigo Advertiser

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Bendigo Advertiser







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...