News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Antenna fight looms 

Antenna fight looms

27 Oct, 2008 09:13 AM
THE community battle over a proposed Telstra mobile phone antenna in Strathdale continues to rage unabated.

Today marks the deadline for concerned residents and community groups to lodge submissions to Connell Wagner, the town planning consultants employed by Telstra to build the contentious structure.

The Advertiser reported the concerns of local residents regarding the transmitter, including the Kay family, last week.

The group claims to have been aware of the planned antenna for less than a week.

The Kay family held a protest meeting in their home on Friday, their backyard bordering the proposed Lowndes Street site for the antenna.

Telstra Countrywide general manager for the Bendigo region Margaret O’Rourke joined four City of Greater Bendigo councillors and about 60 concerned residents at the meeting.

A petition circulating since Friday has now gained about 500 signatures, counteracting the 300 people that lobbied Telstra for improved mobile coverage in the area on the Reservoir Road side of Kennington Reservoir.

The petition can be signed at Strath Hill Newsagency.

The Kennington Preschool Centre, local playgroups and Strathaven have lodged their concerns with Connell Wagner, and the Kennington Primary School school council yesterday met to discuss their position.

School council president Roger Douglas was unavailable for comment yesterday, but he did attend Friday’s meeting.

Kylie Kay said the main concerns of the group related to the health of children and the lack of research into the impact of electromagnetic energy emissions.

On Friday about 20 children played within 50 metres of the proposed location of the structure, which will be three metres high atop the Bargains Galore building and encase three 1.8-metre antennae.

The structure will be the first of its kind to be built in a high-density residential area in Bendigo and will emit more electromagnetic energy than all but two of the district’s 23 towers.

“Margaret O’Rourke said that 300 people requested improved mobile phone reception in the area, but I don’t think they wanted the tower in their backyard,’’ Mrs Kay said.

“The community support has been unbelievable, but so many people are just unaware of it all.’’

A committee will be formed on Wednesday to prepare for the next fight in what looms as a lengthy conflict to prevent the antenna from being built.

The group is attempting to prove building the structure will breach the Australian Communications and Media Authority code for

telecommunications carriers, specifically the clause that relates to building on a site considered community sensitive.

“We’ll go as far as we have to,’’ Mrs Kay said.

“We’ll chain ourselves to the building if we have to.’’

Ms O’Rourke repeatedly stressed during her address to Friday’s meeting that the process behind the planning phase of the antenna - heavily criticised by Mrs Kay as “sneaky’’ - was largely out of Telstra’s hands.

“Information regarding this was mailed out about two weeks ago . . . and this is not a Telstra process, it’s a government regulated process.’’

Ms O’Rourke said she would also investigate claims material sent to residents regarding the antenna was misleading.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
quote "Kylie Kay said the main concerns of the group related to the health of children and the lack of research into the impact of electromagnetic energy emissions" There has been millions and millions spent on research into the effect electromagnetic emmisions may have on health. All of it has shown that there is none to insignificant effects. What Kylie is really saying is that research to support her views has not been achieved. She and her fellow luddite cronies would be better off getting their kids to eat a apple a day and walking the dog.
Posted by Martlark, 27/10/2008 11:09:00 AM
What rock have you been under martlark, abc had a building? Brisbane where at last count 22 staff members that worked mostly on the top floor had developed some sort of cancer. Sydney: children in a residential housing community developed leukaemia at a much higher rate than national average as they played under those huge electricity/mobile phone towers Do your research before you speak.
Posted by nelly, 27/10/2008 4:51:25 PM
@ Martlark: You write: "All of it has shown that there is none to insignificant effects". You are wrong. 10 out of 14 existing studies on people living near mobile-phone base stations show that health problems (headaches, nausea, fatigue and cancer) increase with shorter distance to base stations.

Look it up yourself in the WHO EMF research database. Watch out for Professor Michael Kundi's (uni of Vienna) soon to be published review of all base station studies.

Posted by Henrik Eiriksson, 28/10/2008 5:46:08 AM
Hi Martlark, I understand exactly how you feel and that is exactly what these big telecommunication companies want people to think. All the research that has been done has been on the short term thermal effects of our bodies. They aren't able to tell us the outcomes of the long term biological effects. For example DNA, blood and hormones.

This will effect young children the most because their bodies are still developing. My family will be living in this radiation 24 hours a day 7 days a week.

Many countries around the world are now bringing in laws where telecommunication sites can't be built within 300m of residential areas.

We are not only going to get radiation from the antenna but also the station being built on the ground at the site.

There is also pulse radiation and steady radiation that is emitted from the antenna.

All of their research has been done on the pulse radiation, not the steady which is what we will constantly receive.

I have a 40 page booklet I can e-mail you if you are interested, explaining all the individual health effects that can be caused from this antenna. I hope that this reply helps you understand my concerns a little bit more. I'm not sure whether you have kids yet, but when you do you take a lot more interest in these things and don't take for granted what big companies say because it is all about money for them.

I don't want my family used as human guinea pigs. Telstra won't give me any guarantee in writing that my family won't be harmed. If they were just building a house behind us I'm sure they would.

Posted by Kylie , 28/10/2008 6:41:48 AM
why dont they just put a massive one on one tree hill.
Posted by Nancy, 28/10/2008 5:20:17 PM
The people against the Strathdale tower and any other tower, should get their stories together. We have Nellie, Henrik Eiriksson and Kylie all stating data about research that has been done into the effects of the towers and radiation, then we have the main story of Kylie Kay ...( same Kylie ? ) who states there has not been enough research. Its time you co-ordinated your stories. Another thing comes to mind, Who wrote the 40 page booklet on research that Kylie has ? I am sure that it would not have been written by the phone companies, but by someone against mobile phones.
Posted by Luke, 28/10/2008 5:58:47 PM
To Kylie, How could you request any person or company to give you a written statement that your children will be alright when they have no input into how you as a parent raise them or what other things they may be exposed to at school, down the street or in general public places, it is ridiculous to even contemplate this.

As to the radiation levels, I'm sure your so called expert has been paid to write anything you wish to back your case of not wanting the antenna, I'm sure if Telstra or any other Telco wished to, then they could also pay somebody just as much to debunk the arguments your so called expert has (assuming you have one and not just read all the rubbish on the web that is).

I'm sure there are many other things around your home that would give off a lot more radiation that would be of greater risk to your health that this, if you research any published papers on "electromagnetic energy emissions" and research the emissions with an antenna, I'm sure you'll find ones designed for mobiles at the bottom end of the scale.

I personally want the tower to be built and will never sign any petition to the contrary, bring it on, the sooner the better. In fact, just did a quick Google of the "electromagnetic energy emissions" and found a good website that seems to dispell many of your comments, suggest you have a good read:- http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDA RD/pc=PC_2798

Posted by Charles, 29/10/2008 1:53:45 PM
I experienced a similar problem. When I bought my iPhone, I first checked with “Got Reception?” (Gotreception.com) It’s a great resource for finding out where reception problems are most likely to occur BEFORE you lock yourself with a specific carrier.
Posted by michael york, 16/11/2008 3:56:49 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
CONTENTIOUS: Margaret O'Rourke speaks with concerned residents.
CONTENTIOUS: Margaret O'Rourke speaks with concerned residents.

Most popular articles

 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...